Application of Other Parts of the Code to Class 1, 2, and 3 Circuits

Figure 1

Spread of Fire

igure 1 graphically illustrates requirements that must be kept in mind when doing control wiring subject to the Code. Section 300.21 requires that fire stopping be restored when fire rated walls, ceilings and floors are penetrated. This requires, in most cases, that a listed fire stopping method be used. This may be using a fire stopping caulking compound or other more elaborate assemblies such as used with cable tray penetrations. The UL Fire Resistance Directory describes many fire stopping methods and assemblies that have been tested and listed. These tests measure the time it takes for the temperature to rise to a specific temperature on the far side away from the fire for a specific fire rated assembly, and the time it takes for the flames to pass through the assembly. Throughout the Code there are no exceptions for restoring the fire rating after a penetration has been made.

The fire rating of a wall may be compromised by installing a flush mounted control panel in the wall unless some approved method is used for the installation. One approved method that has been used is to line the panel cavity with sheet rock equivalent to that used on the walls.

Wiring in Ducts Plenums and Other Spaces Used for Environmental Air

The Code has some very strict requirements when wiring is installed in air handling spaces. These spaces have a more than normal supply of oxygen for the spreading of fire, and for environmental air, air that is breathed, there is the danger of spreading toxic products of combustion and spreading products of combustion that can impair vision in a fire fighting or egress situation. Therefore plastic coating on wires and cables are generally required to be plenum rated when cables are installed in ducts, plenums, or other space used for environmental air. Since Plenum rated cables are about three times as expensive as non plenum rated cables it is wise to not install cables in air handling spaces unless there is no other way.

Hazardous Locations

When Class 2 circuits are installed in a normally dry location away from flammable gasses and vapors, and away from combustible fibers and ignitable dust such as in a flour mill the circuit is considered safe from being an ignition hazard and from causing severe shock or burns. This has been demonstrated by many homeowners that replace a 24 volt Class 2 circuit thermostat or a door bell push button operating from a 12 volt Class 2 power supply. It is interesting to note that door bell buttons can get wet and that 12 volts is used for door bells instead of 24 volts. In Charles's Dalziel experiments in the early 1940's he demonstrated that while 24 volts is safe in a normal dry environment, in a wet environment the voltage must be lowered to no more than 15 volts to be safe for humans. And Charles Dalziel used human guinea pigs for some of his experiments.

A Visit with Charles Dalziel

he year is 1941. You are an assistant professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. You are awarded a grant by the California Committee on Relation of Electricity to Agriculture. Purpose: To find the effects of sub lethal electrical currents on the human body. You decide to use healthy human subjects. The subjects are given physical examinations and electrocardiograms. Only subjects in good physical condition are used. Subjects grasp a 12 inch length of bare copper No. 6 wire in one hand and the other hand is placed on a brass plate. Current is passed through the person from the left hand to the right hand. The subject is asked to drop the wire. After dropping the wire the experiment is repeated using more current, again and again, until the subject can no longer keep his hand on the eight inch diameter brass plate. Assistants are then used to hold the subjects hand on the brass plate and the experiment continues until the subject can no longer drop the wire because he cannot let go. This experiment is repeated with 28 subjects and the maximum let-go currents are tabulated and analyzed. Frequencies are changed from 60 cycles per second to 180 cps, then 500 cps, then to 1000 cps and the experiments are repeated. It is found that the average 60 cycle let-go current for men is 16 milliamperes and the average let-go current for women is 11 milliamperes.

Your name is Charles Dalziel and you have just begun. You will establish criteria on fibrillation currents using dogs, pigs, calves, and sheep. You become the authority on dangerous electric currents. Your experimentation will establish the principles for protecting persons from the hazards arising from the use of electricity, and your findings will be used for the notes to the Tables in Article 725 of the National Electrical Code.

When Class 2 circuits are installed in a hazardous location they must be installed just like power circuits in a hazardous location unless the circuits are also rated as intrinsically safe or nonincendive. Intrinsically Safe circuits have specific requirements in the Code in Article 504. Unless intrinsically safe circuits have been also tested and listed as Class 2 circuits, they are not Class 2 circuits.

Myths and Falsehoods about Intrinsically Safe Circuits and Systems

Myth number 1: Intrinsically Safe Circuits are something new.

Many of us got our first glimpse of an intrinsically safe circuit with the addition of Article 504 to the 1990 National Electrical Code. We thought this might be something new. This is the first myth. No, intrinsically safe wiring is not new. It has been around since the 1930's. It all started because of a mine accident in England in the early l900's. Work began on intrinsically safe systems in England in 1911, and by the 1940's certified intrinsically safe systems were available for the industrial market.

Myth number 2: Intrinsically safe circuits are also Class 2 circuits.

This is a common sense statement that is often made by people that do not know the difference between a Class 2 and an intrinsically safe circuit. After all, if an intrinsically safe circuit will not release enough energy to ignite a flammable mixture of gasoline, surely it will not cause a shock or be an ignition source in a nonhazardous location. But, the fact is, AN INTRINSICALLY SAFE CIRCUIT IS NOT NECESSARILY A CLASS 2 CIRCUIT. The two circuits are tested to different standards. Basically, an intrinsically safe circuit is suppose to not cause an ignition of a flammable mixture under any two fault conditions occurring simultaneously while a class 2 circuit is not supposed to shock anyone or be a source of ignition in a nonhazardous location when any number of faults occur. An intrinsically safe circuit is not a Class 2 circuit unless the power supply is durably marked Class 2 as required by the NEC. This does not mean that someone can just mark the power supply Class 2; it means that the power supply must be tested and Listed as a class 2 power supply.

Myth number 3: Intrinsically Safe circuits can be wired as a class 2 low voltage circuits.

If the intrinsically safe circuit is also a class 2 circuit then the class 2 wiring methods can be used. But if the intriinsically safe circuit is not a Class 2 circuit - Watch Out! This means that the intrinsically safe circuit is more than likely a Class 1 circuit, and Class 1 circuits must be wired like a normal power circuit using the wiring methods of Chapter 3 of the NEC. This means that splices must be in boxes. Open terminals are not allowed, and 22 gauge wires are not allowed. That's right, if an intrinsically safe circuit is not a class 2 or class 3 and is not a motor control circuit as defined in section 430.72, we are left with only one option for a remote-control, signaling, or power limited circuit: it must be a Class 1 circuit by default . This means the minimum wire size is No. 18 or other sizes if in a listed class 1 cable. It also means all the relief given for Class 2 circuits in Article 725 do not apply. The intrinsically safe circuit may not ignite the most easily ignitable mixture of gases or vapors for which it is designed for, but it still may be a shock hazard to humans, and therefore, must be wired accordingly.

Where installed in Raceways Applicable Articles in Chapter 3 Apply

The raceway fill requirements of chapter 3 apply to Class 2, Class 3, and Class 1 circuits. No derating is required for control and signaling circuits and likewise for Class 2 circuits. Under some conditions, derating may apply to Class 1 circuits. The raceway sections that require support apply as do all the other requirements.

Page 6